Writing
Assignment 2
Equus: A
Dialogue
The Characters:
Dr. Robert
Steinberg is an orthodox psychoanalyst
and self-professed atheist. He is also a
friend and psychiatric colleague of Martin Dysart. In conversation with Dysart, Robert became
closely acquainted with the case of Alan Strang and with Dysart’s personal
reactions to the case.
The Reverend
John Morpeth is a former professor in
religious studies at
The Dialogue:
Having learned about each other, Dr. Steinberg and Rev. Morpeth carried on a
dialogue via email, in which they shared their perceptions of both Alan and
Dysart. Drawing selectively on what you
have learned in this class thus far, present a series of excerpts from their
dialogue, in which they compare and critique each other’s views on the
following questions:
1.
Alan’s illness:
his bizarre behaviour and its psychological and/or religious features.
2.
Dysart’s personal
crisis, as brought on by treating Alan Strang, and what Dysart learned, or
failed to learn, in the process.
The
only requirement as to how you elaborate the dialogue is this:
neither
can be entirely right or wrong in the other’s opinion.
The dialogue should be five full pages (minimum, you can write
more), double spaced, 1” margins (maximum), 12-point font, paginated. Indicate the assignment (e.g., “Equus
Dialogue”) and your name on the same line.
Leave no more than one space between this and the beginning of the text.
Grading: I will grade the dialogue on the basis of how well it
represents a close reading of the play, a clear understanding and application
of the Freudian analytical concepts (via Dr. Steinberg, the atheist), and a
genuine effort to present an open-minded, religious perspective (that of Rev.
Morpeth).
Enjoy